LinkedIn's AI Shift Reveals How Platforms Now Reward Substance Over Scale

LinkedIn quietly rolled out its largest algorithm overhaul in a decade: the LinkedIn 360Brew algorithm. The change affects how every professional on the platform gets seen, yet most business leaders remain unaware of what actually happened.

The old LinkedIn worked like a closed network. Your content reached people already connected to you. If you didn't have many connections, your visibility was structurally limited. Follower count determined the distribution.

The new LinkedIn works like Netflix. Content reaches people based on what they're interested in, not who they already follow. A 150-billion-parameter AI model called 360Brew now reads and interprets text semantically, understanding meaning rather than counting keywords or tracking clicks.

This isn't a minor adjustment. LinkedIn's engineering team published research describing 360Brew as capable of handling over 30 different predictive tasks that previously required separate systems maintained by dedicated teams. The platform essentially rebuilt its entire recommendation infrastructure around a single AI model that comprehends professional context.

The shift creates both opportunity and challenge.

The opportunity: Smaller accounts with genuine expertise can now reach relevant audiences without first building massive followings. The AI identifies who would find your content valuable by understanding your topic, their interests, and professional context.

The challenge: Overall engagement has dropped. AuthoredUp's analysis tracked median impressions falling from 1,211 per post in June 2024 to 636 per post by May 2025. The system has become more selective. Volume no longer wins.

Now, here’s the thing—when you align the basics to semantic signals, distribution rebounds fast.

Over the last two months at First AI Movers, we’ve helped several professionals realign their LinkedIn profiles and content to the new semantic model—tighten the headline and About section to signal clear topical authority, post consistently on two to three core themes, and front‑load substance in the first two sentences. Results typically show up in three to four weeks: deeper impressions from the right audiences, more thoughtful comments, and inbound opportunities that match your expertise.

To understand why this matters beyond LinkedIn, consider what 360Brew actually does differently.

The old algorithm tracked behavior signals. If users clicked on posts about a topic, show them more posts with similar keywords. If they engaged with certain accounts, prioritize those accounts. The system was optimized for engagement patterns, not for understanding what the content actually meant.

360Brew reads the meaning. It understands that "AI governance framework" and "EU AI Act compliance strategy" are related concepts, even if those exact terms never appear together. It interprets whether someone's profile, expertise claims, and content actually align. It assesses whether engagement is substantive or superficial.

The technical term is decoder-only transformer architecture with in-context learning. The practical implication: the AI evaluates whether you genuinely know what you're talking about, not just whether you've mastered the format.

This creates a fascinating challenge for anyone relying on tactics.

Under the old system, you could study what got engagement and replicate the patterns. Hook formats, posting times, hashtag strategies, engagement pods. The playbook was well-documented. Everyone optimized for the same signals.

Under semantic AI, the system evaluates substance. It cross-references your claimed expertise against your actual content. It assesses whether your posts demonstrate genuine insight or just pattern-match successful formats. It identifies whether engagement comes from meaningful discussion or coordinated gaming.

The implication: authenticity becomes structurally advantageous in ways it wasn't before.

The transcript that prompted this analysis opened with a memorable illustration.

A homeowner needed a kitchen remodel. Two contractors quoted the job. The first arrived in a Mercedes, wore a suit, and said all the right things. The second pulled up in a beat-up van, covered in paint, wearing work boots with plaster dust on his jeans.

The second contractor got hired on the spot.

Why? Because looking like someone who does the work created more trust than looking polished. The paint and plaster demonstrated credibility the suit could only claim.

When someone claims expertise in their profile but posts generic content indistinguishable from what anyone could generate, the AI notices the gap. The semantic understanding isn't just reading your words. It's evaluating coherence across your entire professional presentation.

When someone's content demonstrates deep domain knowledge through specific examples, nuanced takes on industry developments, and responses that show genuine understanding of edge cases, that consistency signals authenticity, the AI rewards.

The parallel to the contractor is exact. The paint-covered professional demonstrates capability through evidence of actual work. The polished consultant only claims it.

LinkedIn's engineering team published detailed documentation on how 360Brew evaluates content. Several principles emerge that matter for professional visibility strategy.

Before your content is considered for distribution, 360Brew analyzes your profile. Your headline and About section define your content niche in the algorithm's interpretation. Posts outside that niche face a structural disadvantage regardless of quality.

Creators who write about leadership on Monday, technical implementation on Tuesday, and industry news on Wednesday confuse the system. Topic consistency over approximately 90 days allows the AI to categorize your expertise and optimize distribution to relevant audiences.

Research on large language models consistently shows that attention degrades with text length. 360Brew places the highest importance on opening sentences. Content buried deeper in posts receives less algorithmic attention.

This isn't about hooks or engagement bait. It's about frontloading substantive insight so the AI immediately understands what value you're offering.

Generic comments like "Great post!" or "Totally agree!" are now classified as "engagement noise" rather than positive signals. Posts generating numerous such comments may actually be penalized.

The algorithm prioritizes content that sparks substantive dialogue, where people add genuine insight, ask thoughtful questions, or share relevant experience. Quality of conversation has replaced quantity of reactions.

LinkedIn's move reflects a transformation happening across major platforms. AI recommendation systems are replacing engagement-based algorithms everywhere.

Google's search evolution increasingly uses semantic understanding to evaluate content quality rather than keyword density or backlink counts.

Social platforms broadly are shifting from follower-based feeds to interest-based discovery, reducing the advantage of existing audiences.

Content recommendation engines now assess topical authority and substantive depth rather than optimizing purely for engagement signals.

The pattern is consistent: AI systems that understand meaning are replacing systems that count behaviors. This rewards genuine expertise and punishes gaming strategies that worked under simpler algorithmic logic.

For business leaders, this shift creates meaningful opportunity.

Large competitors who built their visibility through volume and budget now face algorithmic systems that don't care about follower counts. The AI evaluates whether content demonstrates relevant expertise, regardless of who posts it.

Smaller organizations with genuine domain knowledge can reach precisely the audiences who need that knowledge if they communicate it clearly and consistently. This often involves robust AI Strategy Consulting and Business Process Optimization to ensure their expertise is effectively leveraged across all digital touchpoints.

The playing field isn't level. But it's more level than it was when distribution required either an existing audience or paid promotion.

Phase 1: Audit Your Alignment (Week 1)

Review your profile headline and About section. Does your claimed expertise match what you actually post about? Identify 2-3 core topics where you have genuine depth. Note any gaps between positioning and content.

Phase 2: Establish Topical Consistency (Weeks 2-12)

The algorithm requires approximately 90 days of consistent, aligned posting to categorize your expertise. Choose your topics based on genuine knowledge, not trending opportunities. Every post should reinforce your professional identity within those domains.

Phase 3: Frontload Value (Ongoing)

Structure content so the first two sentences convey substantive insight. Avoid hooks designed to create curiosity without delivering value. Let the AI immediately understand what you're offering.

Phase 4: Cultivate Substantive Engagement (Ongoing)

Respond to every comment with genuine additions to the discussion. Engage with others' content by adding perspective, not just validation. Build patterns of meaningful interaction that the algorithm recognizes as signal rather than noise.

Written by Dr Hernani Costa, Founder and CEO of First AI Movers. Providing AI Strategy & Execution for EU SME Leaders since 2016.

Subscribe to First AI Movers for daily AI insights, practical and measurable business strategies for EU SME leaders. First AI Movers is part of Core Ventures.

Ready to increase your business revenue? Book a call today!

Looking for more great writing in your inbox? 👉 Discover the newsletters busy professionals love to read.